Well-being at work scale (WBWS): Gathering empirical evidence from different interpretation strategies
Resum
Well-being at work scale (WBWS) is a measure widely used in Brazil, composed of three dimensions (positive affects, negative affects and expressiveness/fulfillment) aligned with the field’s recent movement of junction of the two classical theoretical bases (hedonic and eudaimonic) that explain this phenomenon. Based on a cross-sectional survey involving 360 Brazilian workers, this study aimed to compare different models of interpreting the WBWS (including three one-dimensional proposals - composed by a single factor or second-order factor for WBW assessment - and one multidimensional proposal - composed by the three WBW factors singly). Each model was tested through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes, and then correlation analyzes between the models were run to allow their comparison. We concluded that the interpretation of WBWS from a single indicator is viable and more theoretically appropriate when it is intended to have a more integrated view about well-being at work.
Paraules clau
Well-being, Work, Interpretation strategies, MeasureReferències
Alberton, Gisele D. (2016). Inteligência emocional, regulação das emoções e bem-estar no trabalho (Master thesis). Universidade Federal da Bahia-BA
Albuquerque, Anelise S. & Tróccoli, Bartholomeu T. (2004). Desenvolvimento de uma escala de bem-estar subjetivo. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 20(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-37722004000200008
Amorim-Ribeiro, Elisa M. B.; Neiva, Elaine R.; Macambira, Magno O. & Martins, Leonardo F. (2022). Well-being at work in processes of organizational change: The role of informal social networks. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 23(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMG220125
Browne, Michael W. & Cudeck, Robert (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Kenneth A. Bollen & J. Scott Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation mod-els (pp. 136-162). Sage.
Brunner, Martin; Nagy, Gabriel & Wilhelm, Oliver (2012). A Tutorial on Hierarchi-cally Structured Constructs. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 796-846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x
Busseri, Michael A. (2014). Toward a Resolution of the Tripartite Structure of Sub-jective Well-Being. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12116
Busseri, Michael A. & Sadava, Stan W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 290-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310391271
Byrne, Barbara M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis
Carneiro, Laila Leite & Bastos, Antonio Virgílio Bittencourt (2020). Bem-estar relacionado ao trabalho: análise de conceitos e medidas. Arquivos brasileiros de psicologia. 72(2), 121-140.
https://doi.org/10.36482/1809-5267.ARBP2020v72i1p.121-140
Carneiro, Laila Leite; Mendonça, Helenides; Ferreira, Maria Cristina; Pereira, Michelle Morelo; Chinelato, Renata Silva de Carvalho & Amorim, Silvia Miranda (2022). Bem-estar no trabalho: contribuições da Psicologia Positiva. In: Maria N. Carvalho-Freitas, Daiane R. C. Bentivi, Elisa M. B. Amorim-Ribeiro, Melissa M. Moraes, Raphael H. C. Di Lascio & Sabrina C. Barros (Orgs.), Psicologia Organizacional e do Trabalho: Perspectivas Teórico-Práticas (pp. 275-313). Vetor Editora.
Ceballos, Albanita G. C. & Santos, Gustavo B. (2015). Fatores associados à dor musculoesquelética em professores: Aspectos sociodemográficos, saúde geral e bem-estar no trabalho. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 18(3), 702-715. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500030015
Couto, Priscila R. & Paschoal, Tatiane (2012). Relação entre ações de qualidade de vida no trabalho e bem-estar laboral. Psicologia Argumento, 30(70), 585-593. https://doi.org/10.7213/psicolargum.v30i70.20563
Demo, Gisela; Neiva, Elaine Rabelo; Coura, Karina Veloso; Gomide Júnior, Sinésio & Costa, Ana Carolina Rezende (2022). Do Organizational Virtues Enhance Work Well-being? The Mediator Role of HRM Practices. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022200144.en
Demo, Gisela & Paschoal, Tatiane (2016). Well-Being at Work Scale: Exploratory and confirmatory validation in the USA. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 26(63), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272663201605
Diener, Ed (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.95.3.542
Disabato, David J.; Goodman, Fallon R.; Kashdan, Todd B.; Short, Jerome L. & Jarden, Aaron (2016). Different Types of Well-Being? A Cross-Cultural Examination of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Psychological Assessment, 27(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000209
Field, Andy (2009). Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. Artmed.
Gallagher, Matthew W.; Lopez, Shane J. & Preacher, Kristopher J. (2009). The Hi-erarchical Structure of Well-Being. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1025-1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x.The
Henderson, Luke W.; Knight, Tess & Richardson, Ben (2014). The Hedonic and Eu-daimonic Validity of the Orientations to Happiness Scale. Social Indicators Re-search, 115(3), 1087-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0264-4
Huta, Veronika & Ryan, Richard M. (2010). Pursuing Pleasure or Virtue: The Differ-ential and Overlapping Well-Being Benefits of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735-762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4
Huta, Veronika & Waterman, Alan S. (2014). Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Concep-tual and Operational Definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425-1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
Joshanloo, Mohsen; Capone, Vincenza; Petrillo, Giovanna & Caso, Daniela (2017). Discriminant validity of hedonic, social, and psychological well-being in two Italian samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.036
Keyes, Corey L. M.; Shmotkin, Dov & Ryff, Carol D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 82(6), 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
Kline, Rex B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1038/156278a0
Longo, Ylenio; Coyne, Iain; Joseph, Stephen & Gustavsson, Petter (2016). Support for a general factor of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.082
Meyer, John P. & Maltin, Elyse R. (2010). Employee commitment and well-being: A critical review, theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.007
O’Leary-Kelly, Scott W. & Vokurka, Robert J. (1998). The empirical assessment of construct validity. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00020-5
Paschoal, Tatiane (2008). Bem-estar no trabalho: relações com suporte organizacional, prioridades axiológicas e oportunidades de alcance de valores pessoais no trabalho (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), Universidade de Brasília.
Paschoal, Tatiane & Tamayo, Álvaro (2008). Construção e validação da escala de bem-estar no trabalho. Avaliação Psicológica, 7(1), 11-22.
Paschoal, Tatiane; Torres, Claudio V. & Porto, Juliana B. (2010). Felicidade no trabalho: Relações com suporte organizacional e suporte social. RAC Curitiba, 14(6), 1054-1072. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552010000700005
Perry, John L.; Nicholls, Adam R.; Clough, Peter J., & Crust, Lee (2015). Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and ex-ploratory structural equation modeling. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.952370
Ryan, Richard M., & Deci, Edward L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-being. Annual Review Psy-chology, 52, 141-166. https://doi.org/0066-4308/01/0201-0141
Ryan, Richard M., & Huta, Veronika (2009). Wellness as healthy functioning or well-ness as happiness: the importance of eudaimonic thinking. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 202-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902844285
Ryff, Carol D. & Keyes, Corey L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719
Sant’anna, Liliane L.; Paschoal, Tatiane & Gosendo, Eliana E. M. (2012). Bem-estar no trabalho: relações com estilos de liderança e suporte para ascensão, promoção e salários. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 16(5), 744-764. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000500007
Santana, Lhaís A. S. P., & Fernandes, Sônia R. P. (2017). Estratégias de coping e suas relações com o bem-estar no trabalho: um estudo com bombeiros militares. Revista Brasileira de Psicologia, 3(2), 65-76.
Simone, Stefania De (2014). Conceptualizing wellbeing in the workplace. Interna-tional Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(12), 118-122.
Silva, Juliane S. F. (2006). Modelagem de equações estruturais: apresentação de uma metodologia (Unpublished Master thesis). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Silva, Lília B. (2016). Trabalho emocional, engajamento no trabalho e bem-estar no trabalho de artistas de espetáculo. (Unpublished Master thesis). Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Siqueira, Mirlene M. M.; Orengo, Virgínia & Peiró, José M. (2014). Bem-estar no trabalho. In: Mirlene M. M. Siqueira (Org.), Novas medidas do comportamento organizacional (pp. 39-51). Artmed
Sobrinho, Fábio R., & Porto, Juliana B. (2012). Bem-estar no trabalho: um estudo sobre suas relações com clima social, coping e variáveis demográficas. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 16(2), 253-270.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000200006
Soraggi, Fernanda & Paschoal, Tatiane (2011). Relação entre bem-estar no trabalho, valores pessoais e oportunidades de alcance de valores pessoais no trabalho. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 11(2), 614-632. https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2011.8397
Sousa, Alline A. & Dela Coleta, Marilia F. (2015). Perfil profissional, bem-estar e satisfação no trabalho de psicólogos que atuam em serviços de saúde pública. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 32(2), 249-258.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-166X2015000200009
Souza, Ana C.; Alexandre, Neusa M. C. & Guirardello, Edinêis B. (2017). Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 26(3), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
Souza, Jessyca; Bertolini, Geysler R. F. & Ribeiro, Ivano (2014). Bem-estar no trabalho e políticas de gestão de pessoas em uma organização sem fins lucrativos. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 7(2), 3-22, https://doi.org/10.19177/reen.v7e220143-22
Tiberious, Valerie (2014). Philosophical Methods in Happiness Research. In: David Boniwell & ConleyA. C. Ayres. (Orgs.), The Oxford Handbook of Happiness (pp. 315-325). Oxford University Press
Traldi, Maria T. F., & Demo, Gisela (2012). Comprometimento, bem-estar e satisfação dos professores de administração de uma universidade federal. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 72(2), 290-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Turban, Daniel B., & Yan, Wan (2016). Relationship of eudaimonia and hedonia with work outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(6), 1006-1020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07-2015-0271
Warr, Peter (2007). Learning about employee happiness. Revista Psicologia Organi-zações e Trabalho, 7(2), 133-140.
Waterman, Alan S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal ex-pressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and So-cial Psychology, 64(4), 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.678
Waterman, Alan S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudai-monia when contemplating the hedonic treadmill. The American Psychologist, 62(6), 612-3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X62.6.612
Publicades
Descàrregues
Drets d'autor (c) 2023 Laila Leite Carneiro, Antônio Virgílio Bittencourt Bastos
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement 4.0.
