La construcción de las relaciones congoleño-belgas en apología. Un análisis del discurso sobre el pasado colonial
Resumen
Las disculpas han atraído la atención de las ciencias sociales, sugiriendo la necesidad de que las figuras políticas se disculpen por las injusticias históricas del endogrupo. Sin embargo, Bélgica aún no se ha disculpado públicamente por su pasado colonial en el Congo. En 2019, una empresa belga lanzó un concurso que ofrecía a los ciudadanos belgas la posibilidad de escribir una carta de disculpa por el pasado colonial. En este artículo, analizamos cartas seleccionadas por la empresa y examinamos cómo los autores describen el endogrupo y el exogrupo. Basándonos en la psicología discursiva, analizamos cómo se construyen los dos grupos sociales mediante la regularidad y variabilidad en el uso de dispositivos discursivos por parte de los autores. Los resultados muestran que la mayoría de los recursos discursivos se utilizan para mantener una distinción entre los dos grupos. Se discuten las similitudes y diferencias entre las cartas en términos de relaciones intergrupales.
Palabras clave
Disculpas públicas, Grupo social, Análisis discursivo, Ciencias socialesCitas
Augoustinos, Martha; LeCouteur, Amanda & Soyland, John. (2002). Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: Constructing reconciliation and apologizing to the stolen generations. Discourse & Society, 13(1), 105–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013001
Bentley, Tom. (2015). Empires of remorse: Narrative, postcolonialism and apologies for colonial atrocity. Routledge.
Berns, Nancy. (2004). Framing the victim: Domestic violence, media, and social problems. Aldine de Gruyter.
Bhatia, Sunil & Ram, Anjali. (2001). Rethinking ‘acculturation’ in relation to diasporic cultures and postcolonial identities. Human Development, 44(1), 1–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26763492
Billig, Michael. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. SAGE.
Blatz, Craig; Schumann, Karina & Ross, Michael. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30, 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.x
Bobowik, Magdalena; Valentim, Joachim & Licata, Laurent. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: Colonial past and intercultural relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 62, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.10.003
Bosma, Ulbe; Lucassen, Jan & Oostindie, Geert. (2012). Postcolonial migrants and identity politics: Europe, Russia, Japan and the United States in comparison. Beghahn. https://doi.org/10.3167/9780857453273
Burroughs, Robert. (2018). African testimony in the movement for Congo reform: The burden of proof. Routledge.
Cels, Sanderijn. (2015). Interpreting political apologies: The neglected role of performance. Political Psychology, 36, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12092
Clever, Antoine. (2020, June 30). Le roi Philippe exprime ses “regrets” au président congolais. Pourquoi pas (encore) des excuses? [King Philippe express his regrets to the Congolese President. Why no apologies (yet)? La Libre Belgique.
Creative Belgium. (2020, July 30). Sorry is a start. https://www.sorryisastart.be/
Crisp, James. (2019, December 12th). UN tells Belgium to apologise for its colonial past in Congo. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/02/12/un-tells-belgium-apologise-colonial-past-congo
Edwards, Derek & Potter, Jonathan. (1992). Discursive psychology. SAGE.
Figueiredo, Ana; Oldenhove, Géraldine & Licata, Laurent. (2018). Collective memories of colonialism and acculturation dynamics among Congolese immigrants living in Belgium. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 62, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.03.004
Fraser, Heather. (2008). In the name of love: Women’s narratives of love and abuse. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Ghilani, Djouaria; Luminet, Olivier; Ernst-Vintila, Andrea; Van der Linden, Nicolas; Klein, Pit & Klein, Olivier. (2020). Long live the past: A multiple correspondence analysis of people’s justifications for comparing the Paris attacks of 2015 to past events. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(2), 721–747. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1212
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos; Sagherian-Dickey, Thia & Schaafsma, Juliette. (2022). “Sorry for what we did”: A social psychological understanding of political and intergroup apologies (Introduction to the special issue). International Review of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.682
Goffman, Erving. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. Basic.
Gray, Kurt & Wegner, Daniel. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 505. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748
Hochschild, Adam. (1998). King Leopold’s ghost: A story of greed, terror, and heroism in colonial Africa. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Íñiguez-Rueda, Lupicinio & Antaki, Charles. (1994). El análisis del discurso en psicología social. Boletín de Psicología, 44(1), 57–75.
Lastrego, Simona; Aguirre, Sara & Van der Linden, Nicolas. (2025). The construction of Congolese-Belgian intergroup relations in (unofficial) apologies: Appendix. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/386861
Lastrego, Simona & Licata, Laurent. (2010). Should a country’s leaders apologize for its past misdeeds? An analysis of the effects of both public apologies from a Belgian official and perception of Congolese victims’ continued suffering on Belgians’ representations of colonial action, support for reparation, and attitudes towards the Congolese. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347410790193432
Licata, Laurent; Khan, Sammy; Lastrego, Simona; Cabechinas, Rosa; Valentim, Joachim & Liu, James. (2018). Social representations of colonialism in Africa and in Europe: Structure and relevance for contemporary intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 62, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.05.004
Licata, Laurent & Klein, Olivier. (2005). Regards croisés sur un passé commun: Anciens colonisés et anciens coloniaux face à l’action belge au Congo. In Margarita Sanchez-Mazas & Laurent Licata (Eds.), L’Autre: Regards psychosociaux (pp. 241–277). Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Licata, Laurent & Klein, Olivier. (2010). Holocaust or benevolent paternalism? Intergenerational comparisons on collective memories and emotions about Belgium’s colonial past. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2814
Magri-Mourgues, Véronique. (2015). L’anaphore rhétorique dans le discours politique: L’exemple de Nicolas Sarkozy. Revue de sémio-linguistique des textes et discours, 38. https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.10319
Martinovic, Borja; Freihorst, Karen & Bobowik, Magdalena. (2021). To apologize or to compensate for colonial injustices? The role of representations of the colonial past, group-based guilt, and in-group identification. International Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.484
McNeill, Andrew; Lyons, Evanthia & Pehrson, Samuel. (2014). Reconstructing apology: David Cameron’s Bloody Sunday apology in the press. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(4), 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12053
Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Synecdoche. In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved July 10, 2020 from https://www.oed.com
Peetz, Johanna & Wilson, Anne. (2008). The temporally extended self: The relation of past and future selves to current identity, motivation, and goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 2090–2106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00150.x
Petrucci, Carrie. (2002). Apology in the criminal justice setting: Evidence for including apology as an additional component in the legal system. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.495
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. (1987). Unfolding discourse analysis. In Margaret Wetherell & Jonathan Potter (Eds.), Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour (pp. 32–55). SAGE.
Rakić, Tamara & Maas, Anne. (2018). Communicating about groups. In Jake Harwood, Jon Gasiorek, Herbert Pierson, Jessica Nussbaum & Cindy Gallois (Eds.), Language, communication, and intergroup relations: A celebration of the scholarship of Howard Giles (pp. 66–98). Routledge.
Reich, Zvi & Barnoy, Aviv. (2016). Reconstruction production practices through interviewing. In Tamara Witschge, Christopher William Anderson & David Domingo (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Digital Journalism (pp. 477–493). SAGE.
Reinders Folmer, Christopher; Klapwijk, Anthon; De Cremer, David & Van Lange, Paul. (2012). One for all: What representing a group may do to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.009
Rosoux, Valérie & Van Ypersele, Laurence. (2012). The Belgian national past: Between commemoration and silence. Memory Studies, 5(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698011424030
Schumann, Karina & Ross, Michael. (2010). The antecedents, nature, and effectiveness of political apologies for historical injustices. In Ramona Bobocel, Aaron Kay, Mark Zanna & James Olson (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Vol. 11. The psychology of justice and legitimacy (pp. 299–324). Psychology Press.
Sisto Campos, Vicente. (2012). Análisis del discurso y psicología: A veinte años de la revolución discursiva. Revista de Psicología, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2012.19994
Tavuchis, Nicholas. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford University Press.
Wetherell, Margaret & Potter, Jonathan. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. En Charles Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 168–183). SAGE.
Wetherell, Margaret & Potter, Jonathan. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wiggins, Sally. (2017). Discursive psychology. In Sally Wiggins (Ed.), Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications (pp. 3–30). SAGE.
Wohl, Michael; Hornsey, Matthew & Philpot, Catherine. (2011). A critical review of official public apologies: Aims, pitfalls, and a staircase model of effectiveness. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5(1), 70–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01026.x
Zaiser, Erica & Giner-Sorolla, Roger. (2013). Saying sorry: Shifting obligation after conciliatory acts satisfies perpetrator group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033296
Publicado
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2025 Simona Lastrego, Sara Aguirre, Nicolas Van der Linden
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
