Quaderns de Psicologia | 2024, Vol. 26, Nro. 1, e2051 | ISNN: 0211-3481 |

https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.2051

Coach-athlete relationships and life skills development among Brazilian handball players: A prospective study

Relaciones entrenador-atleta y desarrollo de habilidades para la vida entre jugadores brasileños de balonmano: un estudio prospectivo

Gabriel Lucas Morais Freire

State University of Maringá

Sophia Jowett

Loughborough University

Lenamar Fiorese

State University of Maringá

Lorcan Donal Cronin

Mary Immaculate College

Nathan Leonardo Gomes Costa

Ferderal U. of Vale do São Francisco

José Roberto A. do Nascimento Junior

Ferderal U. of Vale do São Francisco

Abstract

This study was to examine the prospective associations between coach-athlete relationship (CAR) and life skills development in youth handball players. This study employed a longitudinal research design. A total of 78 male handball players completed the Life Skills Scale for Sport and the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire over three waves of data collection: start of the season; midseason and end of the season. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance Pearson’s Correlation and Linear Multiple Regression (p<.05). The findings indicated the three dimensions of CAR seem to have higher effect on life skills subscales as the season progressed (i.e., higher effect on life skills at T3 compared to T2 and T1). Commitment and Complementarity were positively associated with several life skills subscales at all three timepoints. Results suggest that the quality of the CAR is an important determinant for the development of life skills in youth handball players across the sports season.

Keywords: Interpersonal relations Positive youth development Youth sports Life skills

Resumen

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar las posibles asociaciones entre la relación entrenador-atleta (CAR) y el desarrollo de habilidades para la vida en jugadores juveniles de balonmano. Este estudio empleó un diseño de investigación longitudinal. Un total de 78 jugadores masculinos de balonmano completaron la Escala de Habilidades para la Vida Deportiva y la Escala de Entrenadores. Cuestionario sobre la relación con los atletas en tres oleadas de recopilación de datos: inicio de la temporada; mitad de temporada y final de temporada. Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis multivariado de varianza, correlación de Pearson y regresión lineal múltiple (p<0,05). Los hallazgos indicaron que las tres dimensiones de CAR parecen tener un mayor efecto en las subescalas de habilidades para la vida a medida que avanzaba la temporada (es decir, un mayor efecto sobre las habilidades para la vida en T3 en comparación con T2 y T1). El compromiso y la complementariedad se asociaron positivamente con varias subescalas de habilidades para la vida en los tres momentos. Los resultados sugieren que la calidad del CAR es un determinante importante para el desarrollo de habilidades para la vida en jugadores juveniles de balonmano a lo largo de la temporada deportiva.

Palabras clave: Relaciones interpersonales Desarrollo juvenil positivo Deportes juveniles Habilidades para la vida

INTRODUCTION

Participating in sports is crucial for the physical and mental health of young people, and it fosters positive youth development by enhancing life skills like teamwork, social abilities, leadership, and emotional intelligence (Johnston et al., 2013; Holt et al., 2017). Charlotte Williams et al. (2020) defined life skills as “functional skills that individuals develop in one context (such as the home, school, sport, community, workplace) and that are also used effectively in other contexts beyond that in which they were learnt”. These life skills are not only beneficial in sports, but also have a positive impact in various other aspects of life, including education, work, relationships, and the community. Ultimately, these skills contribute to improved academic performance, economic opportunities, well-being, and overall quality of life for young individuals (Bean et al., 2018; Cronin et al., 2022, 2019, 2020; Holt et al., 2017).

Life skills can be developed in sports through implicit or explicit processes. Implicit development occurs when there’s a positive structure involving parents, coaches, and participants in the sporting context (Bean et al., 2018; Holt et al., 2017; Turnnidge et al., 2014). Explicit development involves focused discussions and practice of life skills within sports. The development of life skills is influenced by factors like the sport’s demands, program design, coach qualities, teaching methods, social environment, and the practicality of these skills within the sport, as explained by various models (Bean et al., 2018; Holt et al., 2017; Gould & Carson, 2008; Pierce et al., 2017).

Coaches play a crucial role in the development of life skills in young athletes. Studies by Gareth Mossman et al. (2021) and Lorcan Cronin et al. (2018) highlight the positive impact of coach autonomy support on life skills development among youth sport participants. Additionally, Cronin et al. (2022) found that coach autonomy support was linked to the satisfaction of basic psychological needs, which, in turn, influenced the development of life skills. In summary, coach-related behaviors are a significant factor in fostering life skills in young athletes (Cronin & Allen, 2018; Cronin et al., 2022; Nascimento Junior et al., 2021).

The quality of the coach-athlete relationship, encompassing closeness, commitment, and complementarity, is a central element in effective coaching (Jowett, 2007). This relationship is mutually beneficial for both coach and athlete, promoting growth and success in sports and beyond (Gosai et al., 2021; Jowett, 2017, Jowett & Slade, 2021). Research spanning two decades has shown that a strong coach-athlete relationship is linked to factors such as satisfaction, motivation, team cohesion, and sports performance. In terms of life skills development, a study by Stewart Vella et al. (2013) found that a positive coach-athlete relationship was associated with the development of personal and social skills, goal setting, and initiative in young Australian soccer players. However, more longitudinal research is needed to establish causal links between coach-athlete relationships and

The association between the coach-athlete relationship and youth sports participants’ life skills development, as observed in Stewart Vella et al.’s study, can be explained by several factors. Research has highlighted the crucial role of positive adult-youth relationships in fostering positive youth development (e.g., National Research Council and Institute for Medicine, 2001; Roth & Brooks-Gunn, 2016). Furthermore, the coach-athlete relationship is considered a crucial medium for facilitating life skills development in youth sports, with fostering positive relationships being a key element in creating a conducive environment for this development. Coaches’ relationship skills, such as care and active listening, can nurture positive connections and a sense of belonging, which naturally promote life skills development (Bean et al., 2018; Gould & Carson, 2008; Holt et al., 2017; Pierce et al., 2017). Coaches must view themselves as educators and cultivate quality relationships with athletes to set the stage for teaching life skills. Optimal coaching practices involve coaches nurturing strong coach-athlete relationships and providing opportunities for athletes to learn and refine life skills. Ultimately, the trust and confidence young athletes have in their leaders play a pivotal role in determining the life skills they acquire through sports, underscoring the significance of relationship quality in life skills development.

This study addresses the lack of longitudinal research on the coach-athlete relationship’s impact on life skills development in sports (Vella et al., 2013), focusing on Brazilian handball. Handball is widely practiced in Brazil. Life skills cultivated through sports, such as independent thinking, problem-solving, goal setting, creativity, and communication, are vital for young athletes’ future challenges. This study aims not only to demonstrate that a positive coach-athlete relationship predicts life skills development, but also to emphasize how coaches maintaining these connections can ensure ongoing skill development throughout the season. It contributes to the growing body of literature on life skills development, particularly in non-English speaking sport cultures.

The present study

The overall aim of the present study was to investigate the impact that the CAR can have on life skills development in young male Brazilian handball players over a season. Based on the 3C’s (Closeness, Commitment, Complementarity) model (Jowett, 2007) and previous longitudinal (Motz et al., 2021; Silva et al., 2022) and cross-sectional studies (Davis et al., 2019; Felton et al., 2021; Freire et al., 2021), it was hypothesized that T1 CAR would be positively associated with life skills development at T1, T2 and T3 (H1). We also explored whether life skills development increased throughout the season and whether there were differences in mean scores for life skills between the three timepoints. Based on past studies (Lerner et al., 2017; Pierce et al., 2017), it was hypothesized that there would be significant differences between T1, T2 and T3 scores for life skill development (H2).

METHODS

Participants and Procedures

The study population consisted of handball players aged between 15 and 17 years old (M age = 16.17 years, SD = 2.32) from the state of Pernambuco, who competed in the Brazilian Championship 2020. This competition includes young athletes from all regions of the country. The participants included 78 males’ handball players who had practiced handball for 3.18 years (SD = 2.51) and were selected via convenience sampling. The first data collection occurred at the beginning of the season in March (Time 1), while the second data collection was performed at midseason in July (Time 2), and the last data collection was at the end of the season in February (Time 3) (See Figure 1). Data were collected at the team training center on dates that were previously scheduled with the team’s manager. The following inclusion criteria were adopted: 1) to have practiced handball for at least one year; and 2) to have been part of the team for at least three months. Before the data collection took place, ethical approval was granted by the lead author’s university ethics committee. Prior to taking part in the study, participants, parents, and coaches were informed about the purpose of the study and what was required of participants taking part in the study. Only the participants who had the informed consent form signed by their parents and coaches (who were responsible for the adolescents at the tournament) took part in the study.

Measures

Coach-Athlete Relationship.

The Portuguese version (Vieira et al., 2015) of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q; Jowett & Ntoumanis, 2004) was used to measure the coach-athlete relationship. The 11-item direct perspective CART-Q has four items assessing closeness (e.g., “I like my coach”), three items assessing commitment (e.g., “I am committed to my coach”), and four items assessing complementarity (e.g., “When I am coached by my coach, I am ready to do my best”). All CART-Q items were measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 7 (“strongly agree”). Past research has supported the factorial validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency reliability of this scale among youth sport participants (Contreira et al., 2019; Freire et al., 2021).

Life skills development.

The Portuguese version (Nascimento Junior et al., 2019) of the Life Skills Scale for Sport (LSSS; Cronin & Allen, 2017) was used to measure participants’ life skills development in their sport. The validity and reliability of the LSSS has been supported with Portuguese speaking participants (Nascimento-Junior et al., 2019). The 43-item scale uses the stem “This sport has taught me to....” and is followed by items assessing: teamwork (7 items; “work with others for the good of the team/ group”), goal setting (7 items; “set specific goals.”), time management (4 items; “control how I use my time”), emotional skills (4 items; “understand that I behave differently when emotional”), interpersonal communication (4 items; “communicate well with others”), social skills (5 items; “maintain close friendships”), leadership (8 items; “know how to motivate others”), and problem solving and decision making (4 items; “evaluate a solution to a problem”). Participants respond to items on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Past research has supported the factorial validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency reliability of this scale with youth sport participants (e.g., Cronin et al., 2021; Cronin et al., 2022; Nascimento Junior et al., 2021).

Data Analysis

In order to compare the variables at the three timepoints of the season, Multivariate Analyses of Variance (MANOVAs) were used. The effect size (ES) for the MANOVAs was indicated by partial eta squared (η2). The Rhea (2004) effect size criteria for η2 was used to classify the effect sizes as: η2 < .25 = trivial, .25 ≤ η2 < .50 = low, .50 ≤ η2 < 1.0 = moderate, and η2 ≥ 1.0 = large. Considering that the data presented a normal distribution, a descriptive presentation was adopted by means and standard deviation, with subsequent use of parametric tests. Pearson’s correlation was performed to verify the association between the coach-athlete relationship (closeness, commitment, and complementarity) and life skill development. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine if the three aspects of the CAR (closeness, commitment, and complementarity) combined influenced the eight life skills. For our multiple regression analysis, there were no sufficiently strong correlations between variables that indicated problems with multicollinearity (VIF range = 1.56-1.72). Specifically, these VIF values were below the 5 or 10 deemed acceptable by Hair et al. (2014). All statistical analysis was performed in SPSS 25.0 (Morgan et al., 2019) and adopted a statistical significance level of p < .05.

RESULTS

Correlation analysis

The correlational analysis showed that there were significant (p < .05) correlations between the CAR and handball player’s life skills development at the three timepoints of the season. Closeness was positively associated with teamwork (r_range= .22 to .30), goal seating (r_range= .20 to .25) and emotional skill (r_range= .20 to .22) during the three timepoints of season. Closeness was also positively associated with social skill (r_range= .25 to .27) and problem solving and decision making (r_range= .20 to .22) at timepoint 3. Commitment was positively associated with teamwork (r_range= .21 to .27), goal seating (r_range= .21 to .23), problem solving and decision making (r_range= .20 to .24), leadership (r_range= .20 to .24), time management (r_range= .22 to .26) and total life skills (r_range= .24 to .26) at the three timepoints. Complementarity was positively associated with teamwork (r_range= .25 to .30), goal seating (r_range= .22 to .25), problem solving and decision making (r_range= .21 to .22), and total life skills (r_range= .24 to .25) at the three timepoints. Complementarity was also positively associated with emotional skill (r = .22) at two timepoints of the season. CAR total was positively associated with teamwork (r_range= .31 to .41), goal setting (r_range= .28 to .35), problem solving (r_range= .24 to .31), emotional skills (r_range= .21 to .28), and total life skills (r_range= .24 to .40) at the three timepoints. CAR total also was positively associated with social skills (r_range = .28 and .31), leadership (r_range= .24 and .27), time management (r_range= .22 and .26) at two timepoints of season. Finally, CAR total was positively associated with communication (r = .24) only at timepoint 3.

Standard multiple regression

From Table 2, we can see that standard multiple regression analyses revealed that our models which included all dimension of CAR (closeness, commitment, and complementarity) measured at T1 explained a significant amount of the variance in the participant’s development of four of the life skills measured at T1: teamwork (β = .21, p < .05), goal seating (β = .21, p < .05), problem solving and decision making (β = .20, p < .01), emotional skill (β = .21, p < .01), and total life skills (β = .24, p < .01). There were no significant associations between the CAR at T1 and participants’ development of social skills, leadership, time management and interpersonal communication skills at T1. For life skills development at T2, our model which included all dimensions of CAR (closeness, commitment, and complementarity) measured at T1 explained a significant amount of the variance in 7/8 life skills measured at T2: teamwork (β = .33, p < .01), goal seating (β = .21, p < .05), social skill (β = .25, p < .05), problem solving and decision making (β = .20, p < .05), emotional skill (β = .23, p < .05), leadership (β = .20, p < .05), time management (β = .19, p < .05), and total life skills (β = .26, p < .05). There was no significant association between the CAR at T1 and participants development of interpersonal communication skills at T2. For life skills development at timepoint 3, our model which included all dimensions of CAR (closeness, commitment, and complementarity) explained a significant amount of the variance in participant’s development of all eight life skills at T3: teamwork (β = .28, p < .01), goal seating (β = .24, p < .01), social skill (β = .22, p < .05), problem solving and decision making (β = .23, p < .05), emotional skill (β = .18, p < .05), leadership (β = .23, p < .05), time management (β = .23, p < .05), communication skills (β = .20, p < .05), and total life skills (β = .25, p < .05).

Differences for Life Skills Development Across Time

When comparing young athletes’ life skills development according to the time of the season (see Table 3), a significant difference was found for seven of the eight individual life skills (p < .05; ES = .05 to .18, representing a small effect size) and for total life skills development (p < .001; ES = .96, representing a large effect size).

DISCUSSION

The present study investigated the predictive role of the coach-athlete relationship (CAR) on life skills development in young handball players across the season. Broadly speaking, the results showed that the 3Cs (Closeness, Commitment, Complementarity) of the CAR combined had the greatest effect on participants’ life skills development and this phenomenon increased across the season. Furthermore, when comparing participants life skills development throughout the season, results indicated that all eight life skills (teamwork, goal setting, emotional skills, interpersonal communication, social skills, leadership, problem solving and decision making) scores increased across the three timepoints.

The study’s first hypothesis (H1) found that the Coach-Athlete Relationship (CAR) was positively related to all eight life skills in handball throughout the season. This supports previous research emphasizing that a strong coach-athlete relationship, characterized by trust, respect, loyalty, and cooperation, contributes to the development of crucial life skills in young players (Bean et al., 2018; Gould & Carson, 2008; Holt et al., 2017; Pierce et al., 2017; Vella et al., 2013). The study suggests that coaches, through their behaviors and interpersonal skills, can serve as positive role models, inspiring athletes to learn life skills by observing and imitating them. This idea aligns with social learning theory and the concept of role models proposed by social scientists like Robert Merton and Albert Bandura, although further investigation is needed to confirm this conjecture.

The study’s results revealed that closeness in the coach-athlete relationship had a positive impact on life skills development over the course of the season. At different timepoints, closeness was associated with various life skills, including teamwork, goal setting, social skills, problem solving, decision making, emotional skills, leadership, and time management. Commitment in the coach-athlete relationship was consistently linked to teamwork, goal setting, problem solving, decision making, leadership, and time management across all timepoints. Complementarity, on the other hand, was positively associated with teamwork, goal setting, problem solving, and decision making at various stages of the season, with an emphasis on emotional skills during the middle of the season (T2).

These findings suggest that the quality of the coach-athlete relationship, particularly the three Cs (closeness, commitment, complementarity), has a progressively stronger impact on life skills development as the season unfolds. Additionally, the specific life skills influenced by the coach-athlete relationship may vary during different phases of the season, with emotional skills becoming especially crucial during intense training periods. This research provides insight into the life skills that young athletes acquire and solidify throughout a sports season.

The coach-athlete relationship not only impacts performance and well-being, but also plays a significant role in fostering life skills development in youth sports. Coaches can enhance this relationship by promoting closeness through open dialogues, transparency, understanding, respect, trust, sincerity, and loyalty (Gosai et al., 2021; Jowett & Chaundy, 2004). To increase commitment, coaches should collaboratively set goals, communicate effectively, and establish clear roles and expectations. Additionally, creating a conducive learning environment and addressing conflicts effectively are essential for maintaining a strong coach-athlete relationship and team cohesion. Coaches’ investment in building and sustaining quality relationships with each athlete in their team can contribute to the development of crucial life skills that benefit athletes both within and beyond the realm of sports. This approach aligns with the 3+1Cs model by Sophia Jowett (2007), emphasizing the importance of closeness and commitment in coach-athlete relationships.

Contrary to expectations, the second hypothesis (H2) found that the Coach-Athlete Relationship (CAR) in handball was not initially related to the development of all eight life skills measured at T1. However, at T2 and T3, the analysis showed that CAR was associated with the development of all eight individual life skills. This suggests that it may take some time for the coach-athlete relationship to significantly impact athletes’ life skills development. The study is the first to provide longitudinal evidence that the combined dimensions of CAR play a crucial role in predicting various life skills development in handball, aligning with past cross-sectional research emphasizing the coach’s importance in this aspect. The 3C’s coach-athlete relationship model by Sophia Jowett (2007) highlights the mutual influence between athletes and coaches, creating a conducive environment for life skills development within the sporting context.

In terms, we found that, during the season, the development of life skills differed significantly between timepoints. This finding aligns with past research using other analytic methods which showed that the greater the amount of time young people took part in an activity, the more they developed through that activity (Gould et al., 2021; Hansen & Larson, 2007). Daniel Gould et al. (2021) observed the development of life skills in young school athletes. Student-athletes reported developing life skills over the course of the season, as well as dealing with specific critical incidents such as winning and losing big games or dealing with team conflicts.

Limitations and future directions

The current study provided some interesting and novel findings, but had several limitations that need to be discussed. To begin, all data were collected via athlete self-report, which has limits in terms of memory recall, response accuracy, social desirability, and common method variance (Brenner & DeLamater, 2014). Therefore, future investigations should assess CAR using trained observers during training and assess life skills development through alternative assessments of parents, peers, or others within the sporting context. A second limitation was that we did not assess CAR at T2 or T3 during the season, and this variable could have fluctuated during the season. Thus, future research could assess how the CAR impacts life skill development at each specific time of the season. A third limitation in our study was that co-orientation was not assessed in the present study, as only athletes’ views were elicited. A fourth limitation was that we only assessed life skills development and not life skills transfer in the current study. Thus, future investigations could assess life skills transfer via available measures (i.e., Mossman et al.’s, 2021 transfer scale). As such, based on our initial positive findings, future CAR research investigating life skills development in athletic practitioners should look to utilize longitudinal and experimental research designs.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that the quality of CAR is instrumental in the development of life skills in young athletes across a sports season. Thus, throughout the season, coaches must endeavor to create good relationships with their athletes in order to develop their athlete’s life skills. From a practical point of view, the findings found in these studies can help coaches, sport psychologists, and sports professionals to stimulate the development of good one-to-one relationships characterised by trust, respect, loyalty, and cooperation as such qualities seem to promote the development of life skills. In addition, the findings from the present study indicated that life skills development increases over the course of a sporting season. Therefore, coaches and parents need to be aware that athletes will reap the greatest benefits possible in terms of life skills development as the season progresses. Thus, it is important to emphasise the role of quality coach-athlete relationships in interventions and guidelines that aim among others to develop young athletes’ life skills within the sports context.

REFERENCES

Bean, Corliss; Kramers, Sara; Forneris, Tanya & Camiré, Martin (2018). The implicit/explicit continuum of life skills development and transfer. Quest, 70(4), 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2018.1451348

Brenner, Philip & DeLamater, John (2014). Social desirability bias in self-reports of physical activity: is an exercise identity the culprit? Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0359-y

Contreira, Andressa Ribeiro; Andrade do Nascimento Junior, José Roberto; Pizzo, Gislane Contessoto; Sitoe, Selso Ananias; Moreira, Caio Rosas; Jowett, Sophia & Fiorese, Lenamar (2019). Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire for coaches. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 14(3), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119832715

Cronin, Lorcan Donal & Allen, Justine (2017). Development and initial validation of the Life Skills Scale for Sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.11.001

Cronin, Lorcan Donal & Allen, Justine (2018). Examining the relationships among the coaching cli- mate, life skills development and well-being in sport. International journal of sports science & coaching, 13(6), 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954118787949

Cronin, Lorcan Donal; Allen, Justine; Ellison, Paul; Marchant, David; Levy, Andrew & Harwood, Chris (2021). Development and initial validation of the life skills ability scale for higher education students. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1011-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672641

Cronin Lorcan Donal; Ellison, Paul; Allen, Justine; Huntley, Emma; Johnson, Laura; Kosteli, Maria Christina; Hollis, Anna & Marchant, David (2022): A self-determination theory based investigation of life skills development in youth sport, Journal of Sports Sciences, 10(2), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2022.2028507

Cronin, Lorcan Donal; Marchant, David; Allen, Justine; Mulvenna, Claire; Cullen, David; Williams, Gareth & Ellison (2019). Students’ perceptions of autonomy-supportive versus controlling teaching and basic need satisfaction versus frustration in relation to life skills development in PE. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 44, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.05.003

Cronin, Lorcan Donal; Marchant, David; Johnson, Laura; Huntley, Emma; Kosteli, Maria Christina; Varga, Joseph & Ellison, Paul (2020). Life skills development in physical education: A self-determination theory-based investigation across the school term. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101711

Davis, Louise; Jowett, Sophia & Tafvelin, Susanne (2019). Communication strategies: The fuel for quality coach-athlete relationships and athlete satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 21-56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02156

Felton, Luke; Jowett, Sophia; Begg, Chris & Zhong, Xinmiao (2021). A multistudy examination of the complementarity dimension of the coach-athlete relationship. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 10(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000209

Freire, Gabriel Lucas Morais; Silva, Eliakim Cerqueira da; Granja, Carla Thamires Laranjeira; Oliveira, Daniel Vicentini de; Codonhato, Renan & Nascimento Junior, José Roberto Andrade do (2021). Is the quality of the relationship with the coach important for boys and girls in school sports? Health and Research, 10(5), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9206.2021v14n4e8102  

Gosai, Jyoti; Jowett, Sophia & Rhind, Daniel (2021). Coaching through a “gender lens” may reveal myths that hinder female athletes: A multistudy investigation. International Sport Coaching Journal, 9(2), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2021-0046

Gould, Daniel & Carson, Sarah (2008). Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840701834573

Gould, Daniel; Martin, Eric & Walker, Lauren (2021). A season long investigation of social emotional learning associated with high school basketball participation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 34(6), 1102-1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2021.1955421

Hair, Joseph; Black, William; Babin, Barry & Anderson, Rolph (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson Education Limited.

Hansen, David & Larson, Reed (2007). Amplifiers of developmental and negative experiences in organized activities: Dosage, motivation, lead roles, and adult-youth ratios. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 360-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.04.006.

Holt, Nicholas; Neely, Kacey; Slater, Linda; Camiré, Martin; Côté, Jean; Fraser-Thomas; Jessica, MacDonald; Dany, Strachan; Leisha & Tamminen, Katherine (2017). A grounded theory of positive youth development through sport based on results from a qualitative meta-study. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1180704.

Johnston, Julie; Harwood, Chris & Minniti, Antoinette Marie (2013). Positive youth development in swimming: Clarification and consensus of key psychosocial assets. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25(4), 392-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2012.747571

Jowett, Sophia (2007). Interdependence Analysis and Social. Psychology in sport, 10, 13-33. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492595878 

Jowett, Sophia (2017). Coaching effectiveness: The coach-athlete relationship at its heart. Current opinion in psychology, 16, 154-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006

Jowett, Sophia & Chaundy, Victoria (2004). An investigation into the impact of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on group cohesion. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(4), 302. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.302

Jowett, Sophia & Ntoumanis, Nikos (2004). The coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 14(4), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x

Jowett, Sophia & Slade, Katelynn (2021). Coach-athlete relationships: The role of ability, intentions, and integrity. In Caroline Heaney, Nichola Kentzer & Ben Oakley (Eds.), Athletic development (pp. 89-106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003153450-9

Lerner, Richard; Wang, Jun; Hershberg, Rachel; Buckingham, Mary; Harris, Elise; Tirrell, Jonathan; Bowers, Edmond & Lerner, Jaqueline (2017). Positive youth development among minority youth: A relational developmental systems model. In Natasha. J. Cabrera & Birgit. Leyendecker (Eds.), Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 5-17). Springer, Cham.

Morgan, George A.; Barrett, Karen Caplovitz; Leech, Nancy L. & Gloeckner, Gene W. (2019). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. Routledge.

Mossman, Gareth; Robertson, Colin; Williamson, Brian & Cronin, Lorcan Donal (2021). Coaches, parents, or peers: Who has the greatest influence on sports participants’ life skills development? Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(21), 2475-2484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1939980

Motz, Derrick; Rathwell, Scott; Callary, Bettina & Young, Bradley (2021). A longitudinal analysis of adult-oriented coaching practices in masters sport. Journal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport, 52(1), 15-22.

Nascimento-Junior, José Roberto Andrade do; Fortes, Leonardo de Sousa; Freire, Gabriel Lucas Morais; Oliveira, Daniel Vicentini de; Fiorese, Lenamar & Cronin, Lorcan Donal (2019). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Portuguese Version of the Life Skills Scale for Sport. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 24(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2019.1647208

Nascimento Junior, José Roberto Andrade do; Freire, Gabriel Lucas; Quinaud, Ricardo; Oliveira, Daniel Vicentini de & Cronin, Lorcan Donal (2021). Life Skills Development Through Sport in Brazil: A Study Based on Self-Determination Theory. Perceptual and motor skills, 128(3), 1017-1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211000860

National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2001). Community programs to promote youth development. In Jacquelynne Eccles & Jennifer A. Gootman (Eds.), Board on children, youth and families, division of behavioral and social sciences and education (pp. 86-118). The National Academy Press.

Pierce, Scott; Gould, Daniel & Camiré, Martin (2017). Definition and model of life skills transfer. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10(1), 186-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1199727

Roth, Jodle & Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne (2016). Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 188-202.

Silva, Adson Alves da; Fortes, Leonardo de Sousa; Carvalho, Leandro Paim de Cruz; Moraes, José Fernando Vila Nova de; Carvalho, Rodrigo Gustavo da Silva & Nascimento Júnior, José Roberto Andrade no (2022). Quality of coach-athlete relationship and coping as associated factors of stress, anxiety, burnout, and depression symptoms of soccer players in transition to professional: a prospective study. Motriz: Journal of physical education, 28, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-657420220008421

Turnnidge, Jennifer; Côté, Jean & Hancock, David (2014). Positive youth development from sport to life: Explicit or implicit transfer? Quest, 66(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.867275

Vella, Stewart; Oades, Lindsay & Crowe, Trevor (2013). The relationship between coach leadership, the coach-athlete relationship, team success, and the positive developmental experiences of adolescent soccer players. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(5), 549-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.726976

Vieira, Lenamar Fiorese; Nascimento Junior, José Roberto Andrade do; Pujals, Constanza; Jowett, Sophia; Codonhato, Renan & Vissoci, João Ricardo Nickeing (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q)-Athlete Version. Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry & Human Performance, 17, 635-649. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2015v17n6p635

Williams, Charlotte; Neil, Rich; Cropley, Brendan; Woodman, Tim & Roberts, Ross (2020). A systematic review of sport-based life skills programs for young people: The quality of design and evaluation methods. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,00.00, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2020.1792583

GABRIEL LUCAS MORAIS FREIRE

Physical Education Department, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
bi88el@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-9003

LORCAN DONAL CRONIN

Department of Psychology, Mary Immaculate College, Limerick, Ireland.
Lor-can.Cronin@mic.ul.ie
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4459-144X

SOPHIA JOWETT

School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughbor-ough, UK.
S.Jowett@lboro.ac.uk
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7272-0523

NATHAN LEONARDO GOMES COSTA

Physical Education College, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina.
costanathan26@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-5944

LENAMAR FIORESE

Physical Education Department, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
lenamarfiorese@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-7534

JOSÉ ROBERTO ANDRADE DO NASCIMENTO JUNIOR

Federal University of Vale do São Francisco. Physical Education College, University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Brazil.
jroberto.jrs01@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-6967

FORMATO DE CITACIÓN

Freire, Gabriel Lucas Morais; Cronin, Lorcan Donal; Jowett, Sophia; Costa, Nathan Leonardo Gomes; Fiorese, Lenamar & Nascimento Junior, José Roberto Andrade (2024). Coach-athlete relationships and life skills development among Brazilian handball players: A prospective study. Quaderns de Psicologia, 26(1), e2051. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.2051

HISTORIA EDITORIAL

Recibido: 14-06-2023
1ª revisión: 29-09-2023
Aceptado: 06-10-2023
Publicado: 03-04-2024